top of page
1IA24_cover.png
ANNUAL REPORT  2024

The IACHR Annual Report is a benchmark publication showcasing the organization’s work. It summarizes the current human rights situation in the region and discusses recent challenges and progress.

It includes information on the IACHR’s progress and achievements through its different mechanisms. It also contains an overview of the human rights situation in the region, follow-up on recommendations, and a breakdown of the IACHR’s budget.

Petition and Case System

This system is a unique mechanism for protecting human rights in the region by achieving justice and reparation, continuing the fight against impunity, and implementing structural measures that help improve different areas of people’s lives.

Progress and achievements

Friendly Settlements

The IACHR’s Friendly Settlement Mechanism reaches agreements between parties that establish reparation measures for the victims of human rights violations and society as a whole.

11

friendly settlement agreements

16

measures of progress on implementing friendly settlement agreements

85 cases: Full compliance

25 cases: Substantial partial compliance

33 cases: Partial compliance 

113

reparation measures

More progress on implementing measures of reparation.

20

friendly settlement agreements

74

friendly settlement agreements

5

friendly settlement agreements

Precautionary measures

A precautionary measure is a protection mechanism through which the IACHR requests that a State protect one or more people who are at serious, urgent risk of suffering irreparable harm.

1.969

requests for precautionary measures

73

precautionary measures granted

7.681

protected persons

Requests received by country

País
Cantidad recibidas
Antigua y Barbuda
1
Argentina
190
Bahamas
1
Belize
2
Bolivia
45
Brasil
273
Canadá
14
Chile
75
Colombia
462
Costa Rica
40
Cuba
40
Dominica
1
Ecuador
79
El Salvador
37
Estados Unidos
110
Guatemala
43
Guyana
1
Haití
2
Honduras
31
Jamaica
1
México
247
Nicaragua
16
Panamá
28
Paraguay
22
Perú
85
República Dominicana
8
Trinidad y Tobago
3
Uruguay
12
Venezuela
100

Provisional measures submitted to the

Inter-American Court

New request for provisionary measures and 2 requests to expand existing measures

92 legal briefs presented regarding provisional measures

IACHR and IA Court

33

The IACHR referred cases to the IA Court

11 private hearings of contentious cases being monitored

17 public hearing on a request for an advisory opinion

The IACHR participated in

28 hearings 

7

friendly settlement agreements

5

friendly settlement agreements

3

friendly settlement agreements

2

friendly settlement agreements

1

friendly settlement agreements

5

friendly settlement agreements

4

friendly settlement agreements

3

friendly settlement agreements

2

friendly settlement agreements

1

friendly settlement agreements

Follow-up on published merits reports 

Once a merits report with recommendations has been published, the IACHR may take any follow-up action it deems appropriate, including requesting information from the parties and holding hearings to monitor compliance with friendly settlement agreements and recommendations. 

156

​12 cases: Full compliance

94 cases: Partial compliance

40 cases: Pending compliance  

published merits reports

80

cases

Argentina, Bahamas, Belize, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, 

United States, Granada, Guatemala, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, and Uruguay.

Regional human rights trends

  • Democratic elections held across the Americas.

  • Increasing efforts by domestic and foreign interest groups aimed at undermining judicial independence.

  • Escalating polarization is eroding institutional frameworks as partisan allegiances take precedence over democratic norms.

  • Democracy, the rule of law, and human rights are still the cornerstones needed for peace, stability, and development. Checks and balances are critical to preventing abuses of power, ensuring equality before the law, and promoting social cohesion.

Country-specific overviews

click on the countries

Democracy denied

In Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, the essential components of democracy and democratic institutions are under serious threat, jeopardizing the full exercise of the human rights enshrined in the Inter-American Democratic Charter. The situations in these countries include the abuse of power, the erosion of the rule of law, and widespread, serious, and systematic violations of the human rights recognized in the American Declaration and the American Convention.

Cuba

Absence of the core components of representative democracy, stemming from the continuation of a one-party system, the lack of free elections, limited political pluralism, and the prohibition on engaging in political association. 

 

Systematic state intimidation and repression of political dissidents.

 

The government is preventing the implementation of reforms needed to restore the separation and independence of public powers, improve living conditions, and combat impunity in cases of human rights violations.

Nicaragua

A constitutional reform that eliminated the principle of separation of powers, consolidating an authoritarian regime centralized in the Office of the President of the Republic, now held by one male and one female co-president with six-year terms.

 

The enactment of new laws and legal reforms aimed at extending the current wave of repression beyond national borders, and the intensification of repression during elections in areas on the country’s Caribbean coast—one of the few remaining areas where civic and democratic space had not been entirely suppressed.

 

Arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, severe conditions of detention, acts of torture, arbitrary deprivation of nationality, prohibitions on nationals returning to the country, exile, religious persecution, and severe restrictions on civic space.

Venezuela

The political and human rights crisis in Venezuela stems from the complete co-optation of state institutions by a regime whose ultimate goal is to remain in power through illegitimate means.

 

Before, during, and after the presidential election on July 28, the regime employed a repressive strategy to remain in power through state terrorism tactics designed to suppress political participation, obstruct the process of free, fair, and transparent elections, and instill fear in the population.

 

The widespread perception of electoral fraud triggered around 300 spontaneous demonstrations, primarily led by young men living in poverty. In response, the regime escalated systematic repression, using fear as a tool of social control.

Follow-up on recommendations

The IACHR monitors compliance with the recommendations issued in its country reports. This follow-up is conducted through requests for information from States, on-site visits, and input received from civil society.

Brazil

32

Recommendations under review

7%    Full compliance

15%  Substantial partial compliance 

43%  Partial compliance 

33%  Pending compliance

El Salvador

23

Recommendations under review

3%    Full compliance 

10%  Substantial partial compliance 

50%  Partial compliance 

37%  Pending compliance 

IACHR in numbers    

The IACHR’s annual budget covers its operational and personnel expenses and is financed through the Regular Fund (contributions from OAS member states); specific funds (contributions from external donors designated for specific programs and activities); and the Indirect Cost Recovery Fund (ICR), which covers administrative expenses associated with the management of these resources. 

41%

Special funds

 

Financial resources provided by donors (Member States, permanent observers, or permanent representatives).

58%

approved by the General Assembly of the Organization of American States (OAS) and financed through annual payments by OAS Member States.

Regular Funds

1%

ICR Fund

​​

This fund is approved by the General Assembly, covers indirect costs for funded initiatives, and supports the administrative functioning of the IACHR.

bottom of page